Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

Thanks for the reference URL. I had visited this site last year. Notice in my original comments I said nothing of how much expected oil could be extracted over time. My last comments bear out in simple terms that the total extraction of oil at area 2002, over the expected life, simply is not an significant amount of oil compared to the daily US needs. That is all I was trying to bring out. Perhaps my grammer did not bring out the point I strived to communicate. At any rate, like I say, I am all for the drilling to take place.


105 posted on 03/15/2006 5:26:07 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Marine_Uncle

ANWR, if the leases are let in the next year, would keep the supply of North Slope oil at a fairly constant level of about half of what Prudhoe production was at the beginning for the next 20 years while the Prudhoe field amd NPR fields dry up. After that is unknown, but if ANWR does not go into production the North Slope production will fall to nothing sometime between 10 to 20 years from now.


109 posted on 03/15/2006 5:41:28 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson