Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
Whatever might you be referring to?

From the WSJ:

The four-page offer, titled "Proposed Solution to the DP World Issue," promised to give the Department of Homeland Security nearly complete say over the company's U.S. corporate affairs and to install "state-of-the-art radiation-detection and gamma-ray inspection devices" at company expense at all current and future DP World-managed ports overseas. Experts estimate that step alone could have cost DP World as much as $100 million, though some ports where DP World operates already have some radiation-detection devices.
---------
There would at least have been many foreign ports the we had to worry less about.

88 posted on 03/15/2006 11:31:36 AM PST by Mike Darancette (In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Mike Darancette
From the WSJ:

The four-page offer, titled "Proposed Solution to the DP World Issue," promised to give the Department of Homeland Security nearly complete say over the company's U.S. corporate affairs and to install "state-of-the-art radiation-detection and gamma-ray inspection devices" at company expense at all current and future DP World-managed ports overseas. Experts estimate that step alone could have cost DP World as much as $100 million, though some ports where DP World operates already have some radiation-detection devices.

Interesting, although I don't know why that's their job, seeing as how we're not outsourcing security to them, according to Bush. I would think our own government should be the ones responsible for installing the detectors. But if Bush is wrong, it makes me wonder what other aspects of port security are expected to be handled by port operators. That's why I'm not taking his side on this. Too many unresolved issues not being addressed forthrightly by the administration.

103 posted on 03/15/2006 1:06:00 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson