To: T'wit
That is a fascinating way to look at the deeper roots behind the word juggling games of the dark side. I had never considered that perspective but it all falls into place.
3,064 posted on
05/10/2006 6:24:12 AM PDT by
8mmMauser
(Jezu ufam Tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
To: 8mmMauser
>>
For we let our young men and women go out unarmed, in a day when armor was never so necessary. By teaching them all to read, we have left them at the mercy of the printed word. By the invention of the film and the radio, we have made certain that no aversion to reading shall secure them from the incessant battery of words, words, words. They do not know what the words mean; they do not know how to ward them off or blunt their edge or fling them back; they are a prey to words in their emotions instead of being the masters of them in their intellects. We who were scandalized in 1940 when men were sent to fight armored tanks with rifles, are not scandalized when young men and women are sent into the world to fight massed propaganda with a smattering of "subjects"; and when whole classes and whole nations become hypnotized by the arts of the spell binder, we have the impudence to be astonished. The Lost Tools of Learning, by Dorothy L. Sayers (1947!)
3,065 posted on
05/10/2006 6:48:02 AM PDT by
T'wit
(Our top bioethicists: 5)Ludwig Minelli 4)nuclear war 3)Ted Bundy 2)Margaret Sanger 1)Eric Pianka.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson