Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mo
I understood the defendent was NOT a US citizen and consequently has NO "constitutional rights" .....am I wrong here ? !

Most rights delineated in amendments I-X apply to "persons", not "citizens", as in "No person shall be held to answer for a capital or other offense....", so, yes, you're wrong.

117 posted on 03/13/2006 7:48:20 PM PST by Jim Noble (And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

thanks..so American law can be used to the benefit of a non-citizen...and in consequence to the detriment of the citizenry?.


120 posted on 03/13/2006 8:37:16 PM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson