Absolutely true that desire can be counter to what is acceptable. Oral sex was against the law in places, wasn't it? Does that mean that what is unacceptable to some majority is unnatural or has no biological foundation? Homosexuality has a biological foundation, but to what extent differs among individuals! It also has environmental components, but that is subject to individual variation also. As far as whether or not it is "acceptable," homosexuality is not my cup of tea, personally, but I would suggest that (like oral sex) what two people do legally and consentually in private is their business. It doesn't mean the article or the science is flawed because a few lame brains a personally disgusted. Those who criticize homosexuals the most fervently are more likely to be latent homosexuals themselves, or so the old wisdom states.
There may or may not be, in some cases, a biological connection to the unnatural behavior of homosexuality (not always, as with children who were molested). But the fact that it is unnatural is indisputable based on the clear evidence of the human body. If a study ignores the obvious then it is a political study, not a scientific study.
Or so the homosexual agenda activists would state...
Be gone troll....
"Those who criticize homosexuals the most fervently are more likely to be latent homosexuals themselves, or so the old wisdom states."
Old wisdom? Rather, homosexual talking points to shut up the opposition.
So since I am also fervently opposed to abortion, I must secretly want to perform them? Since I loathe leftist agendas, I must secretly love them? Since I am adamantly opposed to rampant pornography, I am secretly attracted to it?
So I guess since you oppose people like DBeers and me for opposing the normalization of homosexuality, you must be a secret homophobe, so the logic goes.