[BagelFace]

Not sure exactly what you said. However, you are making some assertions: 1) someone is not born homosexual - while this is true to the extent that people are not born expressing a sexual preference (either way), it contradicts the current data on genetic and environmental exposures in utero in determining to some extent sexual preference. This is not to deny environment or choice, of course; but this is not to say what I think you were trying to say. 2) science decides what is "normal" - this assertion is also questionable; a good scientist does not use the term "normal" as I think you used it.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

I do not have to assert that someone is not born homosexual. I have eyes. No one is born homosexual. I have enough knowledge of biology to know that all humans are heterosexual. That is just a biological fact. You are making the mistake of defining a person by desire. That is not the same thing. Physically speaking, all humans are heterosexual. Gay men have sperm. Right? Whatever for if they are born homosexual. Why does a lesbian have menstrual cycles? Obviously she is hetorsexual. Heck, the women can't even have intercourse without buying a manufactured substitute for a male body part.

Some people desire sex with children. Some guy in the news a few days ago enjoyed sex with sheep. Some get their jollies from forced sex. Obviously desire can be counter to what is acceptable.