DBeers
In response to yours or the other gentleman's accusations:
I not a "he" nor am I under the age of 20. But thank you for wiping out the years in such a broad swipe! :o) I am not a liberal and belong to no such group.
If I have abused the privilege of posting on FreeRepublic, then I do apologize to the owners of this site for using their forum to ask questions.
I wonder why it is acceptable that you preach your own beliefs in attack against me when you refuse me expression of my own devout beliefs in which I find guilt in condemnation of any one group.
I find it sad that those who are most anxious to have a perfect world, refuse to try and seek answers to the question of homosexuality - and even more important - sit in judgment against certain members of our species of human.
Again, what if it isn't choice - but nature's serendipity??
You are a good man to defend FreeRepublic however and as I also value them, I will drop the subject. It appears it will never be discussed here as long as the core few here refuse a podium to the issue.
Let's pretend it just doesn't exist and then we will not be troubled by it.
One 'belief' that I hold is actually a reality that homosexual agenda activists and scientific 'researchers' completely and intentionally ignore.
The title alone of the referenced article posted here should clue in any 'critical' thinkers to the complete fallacy premising the science supposedly being done on this subject.
Let me break it down for you:
It is fact that there are claims that there is supposedly objective research being done to determine cause(s) of 'sexual orientation'...
It is also fact that there is no test to objectively identify 'sexual orientation'. In fact, 'sexual orientation' is at this time and I would imagine for all time something that is completely subjectively determined -a self-declared proclivity...
So, how can a person objectively discriminate against let alone condemn a 'group' that they can not identify? Better yet, how can science determine causes or cause for something science can not measure?
The answer is quite simple -it is all about sexual activity and feelings. In the case of condemnation here -people reject or embrace activities only. In the case of science here -the 'scientists' (homosexual agenda academic cheerleaders) are actually doing nothing objectively scientific as there is no innate human characteristic called 'homosexual' or 'sexual orientation' -nothing that be measured and as such NOTHING that causes or causes can be attributed to...
That which identifies the homosexual disorder has not been found. The military does not test for homosexuality -the don't ask don't tell policy by default necessarily implies no objective science on the subject is even possible. How can one even hope to state objectively that X causes Y when Y is an unknown not objectively measurable?
It is all Junk premised science, Junk premised equality, Junk premised rights -JUNK, JUNK, JUNK...
Flowery platitudes do not mask the foul odor permeating the junk that is peddled by the left in this regard...
All these supposed scientists push agenda and or fallacy -- These scientists will no more determine any objective cause or causes for those who choose to practice homosexual activity then they will determine any objective cause or causes for those that choose to practice religion.
It all boils down to one thing and it is all about one thing -chosen activities some which society rejects, some which society accepts; some which are constitutionally guaranteed and protected, some which are not REGARDLESS the supposed 'science' premised upon fallacy that attempts to turn reality on its head ...