This too is wrong. How is it I always get the ones who apparently have never discussed their silly ideas with anyone before? Where the dates come from.
Frankly, I'd rather rely on faith on the Bible than on the disputes of anti-Christ geologists and biologists.
Since that's obviously where all you "science" is coming from, I'll just skip ahead to one last question.
And where did I say that sediments are deposited on mountains????
It was a passage that looked like this:
The Evolution model requires various high lying areas like Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Africa, etc. (1 mile above sea level) to be covered in "shallow seas" in order to lay down the expansively enormous and deep sedementary layers that are readily apparent to the naked eye (Grand Canyon, Badlands, Great Rift Valley, Sideling Hill Cut, etc.).
If I read you wrong, it's hard to see how what I think I see there is any dumber than whatever you do think happened. It does not look like a good description of what mainstream geology thinks. It cannot be recognized as such.
Thus, I stand by my conclusion: 1) Your version is impossible, and 2) you have no understanding of the mainstream version.
Tell me about all those mountains on the plains of Africa or America that I was mentioning.
It does not look like a good description of what mainstream geology thinks. It cannot be recognized as such.
http://www.scn.org/~bh162/maas.html
"What do you see down there?" "Looks like an inland sea over areas now 4000+ ft. high, Jim."