Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
What caused the collapse of Easter Island civilisation?

25 September 2004
From New Scientist Print Edition.

THE mysterious inhabitants of Easter Island in the Pacific Ocean did not wreck their pristine environment and so ruin their chances of survival. They were the victims of circumstance and were probably doomed to perish.

Easter Island has long been a mystery: a wind-blasted and treeless landscape dominated by giant stone statues set by its long-since-departed Polynesian inhabitants. Because it was once forested, it has become an emblem of environmental and social decline.

But a detailed study of 70 Pacific islands pinpoints nine environmental predictors of Pacific deforestation before the arrival of Europeans, and comes to a different conclusion (Nature, vol 431, p 443). "Easter's collapse was not because its people were especially improvident, but because they faced one of the Pacific's most fragile environments," says geographer Jared Diamond of the University of California, Los Angeles.

The island's remoteness in the eastern Pacific meant it rarely, if ever, benefited from fertile volcanic dust brought on the winds from eruptions in Asia. It is also low-lying, small and dry. And the island is distant from the equator, so the Polynesians' favourite trees, such as breadfruit and Tahitian chestnut, would not grow there. These factors would have made it difficult for the island's inhabitants to grow new trees to replace those they used.

From issue 2466 of New Scientist magazine, 25 September 2004, page 17

3 posted on 03/09/2006 5:26:26 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: blam

I read years ago that someone calculated it only took 34 generations for the original population to die out. (680 years)


9 posted on 03/09/2006 5:32:04 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: blam
"Easter's collapse was not because its people were especially improvident, but because they faced one of the Pacific's most fragile environments," says geographer Jared Diamond of the University of California, Los Angeles.

I saw an analysis recently that said that the land-ownership system in E.I. was to blame, that had anyone had an incentive to think about the future (as they do in, for example, modern tree farms), the forests would've been more than adequately preserved.

Prof. Diamond is an ecologic determinist who believes that biologists are the primary experts worth listening to, so I suspect he wouldn't have much time for that view.

12 posted on 03/09/2006 5:35:40 PM PST by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Well that goodness someone settled there, otherwise we would not have any Easter candy


41 posted on 03/10/2006 10:03:16 AM PST by jrg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson