[threeleftsmakearight]

QUESTION FOR ALL SUPPORTERS (ON F.R.) WHO SUPPORT THIS DPW DEAL:
How would you have reacted had this deal been proposed during a "Kerry Administration"?

[kinghorse]

the same. we understand economics and engagement of the trouble spots, not wishing them away.

[Wasanother]

If I had been a "supporter" I could give you an answer but like I said before my objections stem from congress promising a 45 day review then reneging and a dishonorable attempt to attach an amendment to our troops money all for political posturing. All my feeling would have been the same under a Kerry Administration, DON'T MESS WITH TROOPS MONEY OR EVEN ATTEMPT! I was leaning for support because no one demonstrated a real security concern based on facts but I was willing to wait the 45 days to see if something really jumped up. 7 days just didn't cut it for me when the promise was for 45 days.

[cookcounty]

"QUESTION FOR ALL SUPPORTERS (ON F.R.) WHO SUPPORT THIS DPW DEAL: How would you have reacted had this deal been proposed during a "Kerry Administration"?"

We wouldn't even know about it(Kerry included) because nobody would have tried to make a political hobbyhorse out of it.

The deal was not "proposed" by the Bush Administration. The terminals were put up for bid by P & O and no American company wants to deal with the Longshoremen, so DPW's bid was tops.