Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ARealMothersSonForever
The problem is they accommodate the bad guys when that's in their interest.

Then, again, why does he not demand that any and all U.S. assets be removed from the UAE?

Why is Duncan worried about safety at OUR posts, where the U.S. Customs is in charge, and NOT worried about the UAE ports?

1,824 posted on 03/09/2006 7:57:31 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1802 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
Then, again, why does he not demand that any and all U.S. assets be removed from the UAE?

Because this whole thing is not an "all or nothing" proposition. The UAE does it risk-benefit analysis, we do ours. Nobody got gut-checked, and the divestiture is not going to close port operations and lead to global chaos. It was business hardball and some congresscritters expended political capital. President Bush actually comes out pretty well, and HClinton has not said "Boo" today.

1,834 posted on 03/09/2006 8:07:12 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1824 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson