To: KJC1
The question was straightforward. Why can't you just answer it?OK. We do not NEED the UAE as an ally. If we can continue with current arrangements, fine. If they scotch all cooperation over this, we do NOT need them. This will not happen. Dubai voluntarily offered to divest the American part of the deal, and did not throw the military out. So you are speculating.
To: ARealMothersSonForever
OK. We do not NEED the UAE as an ally. If we can continue with current arrangements, fine. If they scotch all cooperation over this, we do NOT need them. This will not happen. Dubai voluntarily offered to divest the American part of the deal, and did not throw the military out. So you are speculating. You are dodging. You are adding extraneous garbage to avoid answering a very simple question, which was (at #1529):
Bottom line: Would the WOT (and therefore the U.S.) be better served by A) an alliance with the UAE or B)not having the UAE as an ally? A or B?
1,638 posted on
03/09/2006 4:38:18 PM PST by
KJC1
(Bush is fighting the War on Terror, Dems are fighting the War on Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson