To: inkling
Instead of servicing Navy ships in the UAE, maybe they can have the work done in Guam. Hey, what's a month of travel downtime... it's not like we're fighting a war or anything. This ex-Navy guy is pissed at the port-blockers. What about Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, India, Diego Garcia, etc.
This is about whether an Arab kingdom will control U.S. national security interests. And the answer is "no", even if the President disagrees. This is why we don't live in a dictatorship. The people have spoken, through our House of Representatives. It's a good day for our sovereignty!
1,362 posted on
03/09/2006 2:31:16 PM PST by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: SunStar
This is about whether an Arab kingdom will control U.S. national security interests.
This HAS NEVER BEEN about whether an Arab kingdom will control U.S. national security interests.
1,367 posted on
03/09/2006 2:32:58 PM PST by
onyx
(IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
To: SunStar
This has NOTHING to do with "whether an Arab kingdom will control U.S. national security interests."
THAT, is a blatant and total misrepresentation of this port deal.
1,374 posted on
03/09/2006 2:35:18 PM PST by
Solson
(magnae clunes mihi placent, nec possum de hac re mentiri.)
To: SunStar
This is about whether an Arab kingdom will control U.S. national security interests.Offered here again for your enjoyment; if you repeat a pantload often enough people will start to think it's dinner.
1,387 posted on
03/09/2006 2:42:45 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Everywhere I look all I see are my own desires.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson