Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tulsa Ramjet; Howlin
Here is a little statement that I made on Feb 21st- "The economic benefits of allowing UAE government ownership of port operations have not been made clear. My concern is that the owners of the port operations will determine that cost cutting measures are important. Why pay Longshoreman wages, when there are UAE citizens that will do the exact same thing for less money? These will simply become "jobs that Americans won't do". I do not advocate pulling the plug on the whole deal. I do desire open discussion, and propose divested interest of US port facility operations. If the UAE really needs to run these, they should have no problem establishing a legitimate US business. It would only be "fair"." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1582942/posts?page=1614#1614
1,274 posted on 03/09/2006 1:46:43 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1252 | View Replies ]


To: ARealMothersSonForever
Why pay Longshoreman wages, when there are UAE citizens that will do the exact same thing for less money?

You know better than this. Or you should. It was establised beyond any doubt that DPW was in management, seven levels removed from any onsite position. The longshoremen that are there now would have, and will be, the same men.

1,284 posted on 03/09/2006 1:53:12 PM PST by TigersEye (Everywhere I look all I see are my own desires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1274 | View Replies ]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

"I do desire open discussion, and propose divested interest of US port facility operations."

sounds good to me.


1,288 posted on 03/09/2006 1:56:25 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson