Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MizSterious
The fact that they have mentioned retaliation, rather than just cancelling contracts and orders may mean they are hoping for resolution of the apparent mental affliction that has overtaken Congress.

Bush will veto. If the pubbies in COngress are stupid enough to override, the repercussions will be very real in economic terms, for starters.

And for all the geniuses on this forum, NO American companies bid on the deal, NOT ONE.

Saying they were going to be running a port is like saying an international airline would run an airport, when they would have only one terminal--same sort of thing.

1,118 posted on 03/09/2006 12:27:21 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
And for all the geniuses on this forum, NO American companies bid on the deal, NOT ONE.

What I've been wondering all along, is if they were even given a chance. It's not like this was brought to light before the sale was even done. I don't know how the opportunity was ever put forth to any of our port management companies. How could there have been time?
1,187 posted on 03/09/2006 12:51:34 PM PST by Jhohanna (Born Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson