Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dubai threat to hit back (UAE Threatens Against Boeing and US Bases Support)
The Hill.com ^ | March 9, 2006 | Roxana Tiron

Posted on 03/09/2006 9:02:17 AM PST by prairiebreeze

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,181-1,2001,201-1,2201,221-1,240 ... 2,441 next last
To: jpsb

LoL I wondered how long it would take for the One Note Wonders to chime in with their crap. Good Job.


1,201 posted on 03/09/2006 12:57:18 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

I don't like the I've been here longer then you argument. Total BS, I could have done that to her, it means nothing.


1,202 posted on 03/09/2006 12:57:37 PM PST by jpsb (Proud USMC vet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1179 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen
I guess I'm in the "red-necked, hicksville, far right-wing, xenophobic" camp for opposing open borders.

Nah, you're not. You're just reasonable and intelligent! :P
1,203 posted on 03/09/2006 12:57:37 PM PST by Jhohanna (Born Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1152 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
That's funny, because our "friends" were the ones who plunged two fully-fueled commerical jets into Towers 1 and 2 of the WTC, one into the Pentagon, and attempted to fly another into Capitol Hill.

I'd hate to see what our "enemies" would do if given the chance.

1,204 posted on 03/09/2006 12:57:49 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1188 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852; justshutupandtakeit

You have to admit the moniker "justshutupandtakeit" has a certain ring to it. I appreciate all sides of the debate, until the smear campaigns start.


1,205 posted on 03/09/2006 12:57:50 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1190 | View Replies]

To: bwteim
From your Business Week article:

Lawmakers who have been trying to block the deal involving DP World said they were studying the company's announcement to see if it adequately addressed their concerns about an Arab government taking over major operations at six U.S. ports.

There it is. The motivation for it all. At least BW got that right.

1,206 posted on 03/09/2006 12:57:59 PM PST by TigersEye (Everywhere I look all I see are my own desires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1173 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Don't put on a tinfoil hat too quick - Warner was reading a prepared statement from DP's Edward H. Bilkey according to the news.

Take it up with Ed if it is not right.


1,207 posted on 03/09/2006 12:58:24 PM PST by bwteim (Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

Got any vacancies in your camp?


1,208 posted on 03/09/2006 12:59:26 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1203 | View Replies]

To: teawithmisswilliams
You missed the fact that it was the conservative grass-roots who started this. Schumer jumped on it when it became visible on the politcal radar screen.

Yes, I did miss that. Link please. Got a source for that assertion?

1,209 posted on 03/09/2006 1:01:30 PM PST by TigersEye (Everywhere I look all I see are my own desires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1175 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852; All

----Okay - I and apparently many other people are stupid.----

The 'Bots would have us believe that the 81% of the American public that will not automatically bown down to King George are "stupid" for refusing to extend him a two-term lease on their own thought processes.

Cults of personality are not particularly forgiving to those who question the center of their devotion. The body of Free Republic really ought to ask itself if this is what it wants to be, or if it wants to maintain some level of credibility as a meaningful conservative forums.

----But we won anyway.----

That's what's so delicious.

-Dan

1,210 posted on 03/09/2006 1:01:56 PM PST by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1190 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

In what way has the UAE supported the Iranian nuclear program?


1,211 posted on 03/09/2006 1:02:01 PM PST by .cnI redruM (We need to banish euphemisms. Period. In fact, we need to employ hyperbole when possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1157 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Yes, national security trumps all.


1,212 posted on 03/09/2006 1:02:47 PM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

I hope you are right PD. However I have my doubt that President Bush will veto this appropriation bill for the troops where the knee jerks in Congress (unfortunately lead our GOP congressmen) inserted this Dubai Ports deal blockage in it. Do you really think that the President will go on national TV to explain why he is vetoing the bill and expose the hysteria of Congress? I doubt it but I hope you are right. People who have “mis”underestimated President Bush and pronounced his political death so many times have been thrown into their own political grave. We shall see anyway.


1,213 posted on 03/09/2006 1:02:49 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

That's just real rich and mature, Howlin.


1,214 posted on 03/09/2006 1:03:17 PM PST by Jhohanna (Born Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1169 | View Replies]

From the Business Week article:

"It would have to be an American company with no links to DP World, and that would be a tremendous victory and very gratifying," said King, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.

And if there is still no American company that wants it?

1,215 posted on 03/09/2006 1:05:09 PM PST by TigersEye (Everywhere I look all I see are my own desires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1200 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet
This move had national security in mind when it was conceived.

Much of what we do on the war on terror is not so obvious nor public.

The administration could not go public with anything that would help removed public concerns without causing problems for the UAE.

The public, with our stupid ass ed congress critters at the helm have injected themselves into something that they should never have done and at our detriment.

They have now screwed the pooch, so to speak.

This never should have happened and it is the reason these things are done in private as congress had set up to keep it out of politics.

This is essentially a national security leak and very big screw up.

I'm done with this for now, but have made plenty of mental notes as to who does not need to be in congress any longer.

I will act accordingly, and I also publicly apologize to the UAE for the stupidity of our U.S. lawmakers.

1,216 posted on 03/09/2006 1:05:12 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

The sources quoted in this article are anonymous. I doubt anyone in the media really knows the reaction of the Dubai royals. I am sure they expected some opposition. Sounds like speculation to me.


1,217 posted on 03/09/2006 1:05:41 PM PST by Courdeleon02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
My philosophy is when you have to start name-calling, you have lost the debate.
1,218 posted on 03/09/2006 1:06:01 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1205 | View Replies]

To: Jhohanna

----That's just real rich and mature, Howlin.----

It should be. She's been here so much longer than so many of us. ;)

-Dan

1,219 posted on 03/09/2006 1:06:05 PM PST by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor

"That's what's so delicious."

LOL - true!


1,220 posted on 03/09/2006 1:06:58 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1210 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,181-1,2001,201-1,2201,221-1,240 ... 2,441 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson