Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Greg o the Navy
We must keep our eyes on the prize: out with Darwinism, in with Creationism. If this means adopting an incrementalist approach (i.e., Intelligent Design,) so be it.

I am curious. When you say this, are you saying that those who claim that there is no religious implication behind Intelligent Design when defending its inclusion in public school science courses are lying?
96 posted on 03/08/2006 9:56:16 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

Most certainly not, and if that's the way my posting struck you then you have my apologies.

People choose their issues for their own honest and well-meaning reasons. In my case, and I know that other Believers share my view, if ID is the tack that finally purges Darwin from the schools ... I'm all for it.


97 posted on 03/08/2006 10:08:39 PM PST by Greg o the Navy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson