Replies

LOL!

I wish I had oodles of time to waste and rip apart your hypocritical reply but I don't. Your reply speaks for itself. You are more than welcome to go round and round with someone else on your worn out wordsmithing games.

Perhaps someday, although I am not optimistic, you will see how objective science supports Creation, or if you prefer "Intelligent Design" without even using "religion". I suppose I should be careful ... some despise God so much that the phrase "Intelligent Design" is barely tolerated. What's nice about "truth" is that it NEVER evolves. It's always there and it's consistent - no wild theories or hoaxes to contend with ... "truth" doesn't change.

As always, believe whatever you wish!

Perhaps someday, although I am not optimistic, you will see how objective science supports Creation, or if you prefer "Intelligent Design" without even using "religion".

If you believe that this is the case, why do you not reference some of this objective science?

I suppose I should be careful ... some despise God so much that the phrase "Intelligent Design" is barely tolerated.

Again, why do you assume that all who oppose Intelligent Design "despise God" when it is clearly established that a large number of those people are theists? I am curious as to why you continue to make clearly false assumptions despite ample evidence to the contrary.

" I wish I had oodles of time to waste and rip apart your hypocritical reply but I don't."

I have not been hypocritical at all. Do you even know what the word means?

"You are more than welcome to go round and round with someone else on your worn out wordsmithing games."

What in the world are you talking about? I asked you if the designer of ID is really the God of the Bible, and you said yes. This puzzled me, as the proponents of ID all publicly state that ID has nothing to do with God or religion. You say it does. Someone isn't being honest here, and I think that it is the proponents of ID.

"Perhaps someday, although I am not optimistic, you will see how objective science supports Creation, or if you prefer "Intelligent Design" without even using "religion"."

When creationism/ID presents a testable claim that doesn't go against the available evidence I'll consider it. That day hasn't come yet.

"some despise God so much that the phrase "Intelligent Design" is barely tolerated."

Some must despise God so much that they pretend that ID has nothing to do with God. That would be the major proponents of ID.

"What's nice about "truth" is that it NEVER evolves."

What's nice about science and the knowledge gained from it is that it DOES evolve when knew information becomes available. Can't say that for creationism.

" As always, believe whatever you wish!"

Well, from your testimony, I will believe that the proponents of ID are all liars, because as you say the designer is God, but they say that the designer is not God and that those who claim that ID has anything to do with God are ignorant of ID. Thanks for clearing that up for us. :)