[RunningWolf]

Why not attack the theories of gravity? The evos always ask?

A better question. Is why are the secularist atheist humanists attempting to use this toe theory to advance their agenda?

Yet once again, one must do an inversion-to take the reciprocal, in order to get to the core of the evo agenda.

BTW all theories at present have failures, break down at the ends, do not hold true at several levels. evo or toe is in turn 'a theory' based on theories in several fields all of those theories with their own holes gaps etc.

And yet this is what the evos would have you accept as your reality. I am one of the few that would say 'no thanks' to that even with no other competing theory. I would rather be in the group of scientists who acknowledge they are in uncharted seas than accept the false map of evo.

Wolf

[nmh]

The more I see and read about the evidence, the sillier evolution is.

I am not the least bit threatened by evolution being compared to Creation. In fact I encourage it! No kidding! Comparing the two puts evolution in its proper place and exposes it's non science based hypotheses. Creation fully supports the laws of science and even kids can see that.

It's interesting to watch kids come alive with questions and see how Creation easily answers them. It's almost as though they're rejuvenated since under evolution, they're being preached at with no room for criticism - well, because it is a religion to MANY.