Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rokke
You didn't define theory, but you did choose to narrow the definition of theory in order to support your argument.

When multiple definitions of a word are available, it is important to clarify the definition used in a specific context to avoid ambiguity. Otherwise, false equivocation can result. That was my original point. It is a logical fallacy to believe two concepts are comparable simply because the same word can be used to describe both concepts if that word has a different definition when used in each case.
50 posted on 03/08/2006 12:28:20 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio; Rokke
Zogby does not seem to give you/your concerns much weight in the relevancy category Dimi.

What up with that?

Wolf
51 posted on 03/08/2006 12:47:49 AM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson