To: Rokke
You didn't define theory, but you did choose to narrow the definition of theory in order to support your argument.
When multiple definitions of a word are available, it is important to clarify the definition used in a specific context to avoid ambiguity. Otherwise, false equivocation can result. That was my original point. It is a logical fallacy to believe two concepts are comparable simply because the same word can be used to describe both concepts if that word has a different definition when used in each case.
50 posted on
03/08/2006 12:28:20 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio; Rokke
Zogby does not seem to give you/your concerns much weight in the relevancy category Dimi.
What up with that?
Wolf
51 posted on
03/08/2006 12:47:49 AM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson