Nope, you're trying to change the topic. The original assertion by the original poster was that the Second Law demands that light always break down molecules and never build them up. That assertion has been refuted.
As for your second assertion, you're operating from the argument from personal incredulity again.
OK. So what? Answer the questions I asked you. I can flip the switch on a refrigerator and produce cold in a hot environment.
What second assertion involving personal incredulity? That life is a complex arrangement of chemical reactions? Or that living things die?