Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4bbldowndraft
Imagine smoking didn't exist.

Then what would the doctors blame lung cancer on?

Get tobacco entirely out of the picture and there will still be lung cancer.

Whatever your beef with smoking, we would all be better off if all the money pissed away on lame ad campaigns, stupid billboards, and propaganda crusades had been spent on basic cancer research and finding cures for cancer regardless of what the cancer is blamed on.

45 posted on 03/07/2006 5:41:27 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

You are right. Don't forget Linda McCartney died of breast cancer, and she was a clean living, thin vegetarian. But that doesn't stop groups from claiming that it's caused by hormones in meat.The fact is we don't always know what causes some people to develop cancers. Cancer arises in all organs of the body. Why in the case of lung cancer does it HAVE to be because of tobacco?


210 posted on 03/07/2006 7:41:18 AM PST by boop (The Gimp's asleep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson