Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samantha

Oh there's no question about the importance of WFB to modern conservatism, and it's no small point that he would concede that Reagan could beat him on occasion. But he was focused on the fight against communism.

But after communism fell in Europe and Russia, he went wobbly.


643 posted on 03/05/2006 3:50:47 PM PST by saveliberty (Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: saveliberty

Yes, he was specifically against Communism, but when he was on the Firing line Program he was always against the liberals on everything. He was always a Gentleman even when in conflict with a less than Gentlemanly Democrat or opponent. That lack of mean spiritedness and ability to debate with decency set the standard for the Conservatives. It is not something that can be duplicated today because of the viciousness of those out of power. Scratching,clawing,insulting,interrupting are how Democrats handle Debate. All the Pubbie has to do is clear his throat or take a breath and the nasty Dem will attack like a mongoose.


673 posted on 03/05/2006 5:54:58 PM PST by samantha (cheer up, the adults are in charge! Soldier in Bucket Brigade Reporting for Duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson