Arging to broaden the application of the process, what condtitutes "threat to national security." She charges that CFIUS is looking on ly at investment and cash flow, and not on technology transfer to security ramifications.
Sometimes, the agencies don't follow the intent of the law - so in reaction the Senate decides to change the law?
That's all they know how to do
She wants a make new committee ??
Since CFIUS was created (and updated) through an Executive Order, they don't have the authority to dissolve it,do they?