Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Areva, owned by the French government, competes for design and construction of power plants mainly with Westinghouse and General Electric Co.'s unit GE Energy.

Do we have a security problem here.

1 posted on 02/28/2006 9:09:10 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: demlosers

Oops, forgot link:

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID=2006-03-01T023840Z_01_N28307120_RTRUKOC_0_US-UTILITIES-AREVA-ABRAHAM.xml&archived=False


2 posted on 02/28/2006 9:10:09 PM PST by demlosers (Kerry: "Impeach Bush, filibuster Alito, withdraw from Iraq, send U235 to Iran, elect me President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
The Left is against nuclear power solely because it would be so effective. They can't have the U.S capitalist economy functioning well.

If Cuba were to develop nuclear power plants the Left would celebrate Castro's achievement.

3 posted on 02/28/2006 9:15:43 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers
I read this as only building at existing sites. Are they talking about expanding or replacing reactors? By using existing sites, can they get around the enviros objections, anyone know?
4 posted on 02/28/2006 9:17:38 PM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers

Well given that you'll fuel it with Canadian uranium (more than likely) I wouldn't panic too much.:) People might have issues with the French, but they make one hell of a reactor.


6 posted on 02/28/2006 9:22:38 PM PST by Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: demlosers

Next item on the agenda -- reprocessing of spent fuel. Bet you guys didn't know that only about 5% of the fuel is actually used up during a "cycle" (which is approximately 6 years). That is, only about 5% of the enriched uranium is "burned" before the fuel assembly starts to become too inefficient for power generation.

Reprocessing that fuel would allow the US to pull out the 95% unused fuel and repackage it in new fuel assemblies. But Jimmy Carter forbid that, so we are left with lots and lots of nuclear waste with usuable fuel still in it.


12 posted on 03/01/2006 4:34:43 AM PST by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson