I think one can garner your political leanings, joining FR just to post this piece. This oped by Science magazine is easily dismissed. Why ? The fraud that pervades the IPCC, upon which most global warming experts rely. Global warming and Darwinism have become industries unto themselves that is reliant on government funding and grants. To keep that money flowing, they must paint the most dire pictures (global warming) and deny/demean any opposition (global warming and Darwinism). To let counter opinions gain legitimacy will certainly dry up the funds they so enjoy spending and living off of. Magazines like Science and Nature do have self-serving agendas, to keep the money flowing for their sacred cows. Sadly, instead of advancing science, they engage in scientific censorship.
The above said, I do hope a ZOT does not occur, though your leanings are apparent and contrary to most on this site, your tone was not offensive.
The reason for my post was to point out the fact that we have politicians who think it is OK to tell scientists what they may and may not say at scientific meetings. And the tone of your comment makes it obvious that this is a general problem with what used to be called conservatives.