> Now that is a pejorative assessment painting with a broad brush stroke. Demonization is a very lame debate tactic.
I am only replying because you correctly recognized my rhetoric. I have only one word for Rush Limbaugh, and that's stfu. As for the rest of the knee jerk conservatives, the word is desertification. Tell your grandchildren I told 'em so.
You said you had questions about mankinds effect on GW, (we'll all agree there is GW), and you questioned what we should do about it. Now you seem to be predicting disaster. Are you saying that we will cause such a disaster? Then you must have the answer to question 2. If desertification is your answer, then how will the models work which add water vapor to produce warming. If it's just desertification somewhere, but not everywhere, why don't we move farming to the wetter areas? Are you seriously saying there will be desertification over large areas?
I don't think those are knee jerk questions do you?
If you listened to Rush, this is his opinion as well. So if your opinion matches his (no matter if you researched it yourself), I should not listen to anything else you say, since you are a mind-numbed "dittohead" that only thinks what Rush tells him to.
I am only replying because you correctly recognized my rhetoric. I have only one word for Rush Limbaugh, and that's stfu. As for the rest of the knee jerk conservatives, the word is desertification. Tell your grandchildren I told 'em so.
What causes desertification? Is it a natural process? Is there less water on earth? Are there places gaining wetlands? You sound like you'd rather demean the person than take on the argument. So, as for whatever you are (greenpeace, liberal, non-knee-jerk conservative, moderate wind-shifter) I don't care, I try to keep an open mind...but I would never be open to your kind of argument.