Posted on 02/24/2006 7:12:07 PM PST by CometBaby
"I can tell you the main reason behind all our woes it is America." The New York Times reporter is quoting the complaint of a clothing merchant in a Sunni stronghold in Iraq. "Everything that is going on between Sunni and Shiites, the troublemaker in the middle is America."
One can't doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed. The same edition of the paper quotes a fellow of the American Enterprise Institute. Mr. Reuel Marc Gerecht backed the American intervention. He now speaks of the bombing of the especially sacred Shiite mosque in Samara and what that has precipitated in the way of revenge. He concludes that The bombing has completely demolished what was being attempted to bring Sunnis into the defense and interior ministries.
Our mission has failed because Iraqi animosities have proved uncontainable by an invading army of 130,000 Americans. The great human reserves that call for civil life haven't proved strong enough. No doubt they are latently there, but they have not been able to contend against the ice men who move about in the shadows with bombs and grenades and pistols.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Watching members of a conservative website that very well might not exist in the absence of Bill Buckley is astounding.
While I am fully supportive of the WOT and our efforts in Iraq, anyone who believes with any degree of certainty that a stable democracy will be the ultimate outcome must have some pretty strong stuff.
LOL! You mean I don't have to feel vaguely inadequate as I drift into a stupor waiting for him to finish his sentences, with all those big, obscure words, intoned ponderously?
We have (perhaps by necessity) successfully persuaded hordes of analytically inept moral slobs into voting with us. When ever righteousness again becomes un-cool, I don't believe we can count on them.
I would suggest people read the whole article before attacking WFB.
Yes, he is saying that the project in Iraq has failed, but he is saying that we should not allow that to create a feeling that democratization can never work.
Also, he suggests that if we were willing to take the kind of measures we did after WWII, we could still make it work.
I don't believe Buckley has been a believer in the mission in Iraq from the very beginning.
I don't remember Buckley's position in the beginning, but he's been teetering on the brink of declaring Iraq a failure for a while now. I guess the Samarrah mosque bombing pushed him over the line.
It's going to be interesting to see how Rush Limbaugh reacts to this. Buckley is a huge hero of his.
There are too many here now who adhere to a man, rather than a philosophy.
This wouldn't be the first time that Buckley was wrong. Bush has a much longer-term view. Iraq will not be won or lost in his term.
Interesting comment, Newbie.
Would you prefer hip-hop?
Pygmy? Bushmen 'click'?
Buckley is wrong here, but that takes away nothing from his illustrious career. He was, after all, one who in 1955 stood athwart history and yelled "Stop." He inspired others who have since taken up the mantle. I grew up politically on National Review during the 80's (favorite reading material of one Ronald Reagan) and I'll always feel a debt of gratitude to this man.
Oh, stop teasing us.
We have gone from God and Man at Yale to Man and Boy for sale; oak trees on mountain tops cast long, but lonely shadows.
This war will end just like Vietnam I'm sorry to say.
It's little bill.
Glad Honest Abe did not take that approach back in 1865.
Yeah, the war on drugs is working just fine. Keep believing that.
It may, but if it does, it will be largely for the same reason.
For consistency, may you wish to remove Buckley's image from your profile?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.