An atheist buddy of mine used to say that the difference him and us was he believed in just one less god.
Of course, he believed in "the good smoke" as a solution to the world's problems with all the fervor of anyone with a religion.
What you have to understand is that there is a third position that can be taken in the debate that doesn't draw on any of the Evo/Creationist beliefs.
And what is this third position?
When you've let us know what your position is, and what evidence supports it, we'll be able to debate it.
People who claim "not to have a dog in the fight" or to "not believe either creation or evolution" invariably offer up no criticism whatsoever of the creationist position, and pose "difficult questions" (often actually completely standard and endlessly refuted creationist talking points) for evo. Usually after a while it becomes transparently obvious that they are dyed-in-the-wool creationists pretending not to be because they think they gain debating advantage thereby. I'm sure you are not in that category though.