Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky

Let me take a guess at what WON'T be said:

"Kennewick Man was Caucasian."


2 posted on 02/22/2006 1:29:20 PM PST by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wombat101

They're going to say the Kennewick Man was Japanese (but of the type before the Chinese arrived).


7 posted on 02/22/2006 1:34:17 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Wombat101

He was most likely mongoloid. But who knows. It also could have been a skeleton of an early Europeon settler. But with
"scientists" automatic knee jerk reaction to make everything a billion years old via carbon dating which relies on assuptions and calibrated by tree rings from trees buried 3,500 years ago but "assumed" to be millions of years old themselves, who really knows for sure. <- (sarcastic teasing)

What ironic is the same people who argue for carbon dating toss the whole theory out the window when arguing against global warming. <- (bewilderment)

And save the replies to the contrary. I've heard them all before. <-(truth)

I think it's still going to be very hard to explain the timex watch he was wearing. <- (joke)

Let's worry about todays problems, like global jihad and the failure of our politians to take this Hitler-like idiology called Islam seriously. <- (serious issue)


13 posted on 02/22/2006 1:49:16 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Wombat101
Scientists tell the truth. No PC from them./sarc

The only thing they could say about him that wouldn't be challenged would be that he was a muzzie. Muzzie scholars would surely agree and no one would disagree for fear of decapitation.

38 posted on 02/22/2006 2:30:08 PM PST by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Wombat101
From what I remember from older articles, the initial guesses was that he was of some sort of Polynesian ancestry.

Hence, the "First Nation" types, to borrow a Canadian term, fight to keep researchers away from a skeleton much older
than what American Indians can document, "poodle papers" notwithstanding.

I did try to buy a book on the subject, but B&N couldn't find the one copy they had on hand, and my interest wandered
to other things...

40 posted on 02/22/2006 2:45:47 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Wombat101

Bump!

This is when the Clinton adminstration buldozed the site the bones were found.

The indian tribes are realllly scared of this revealing he was not an indian.

This would prove that EVERY one came to this continent.


60 posted on 02/22/2006 6:42:25 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Wombat101
Let me take a guess at what WON'T be said:
"Kennewick Man was Caucasian."

As far as I can tell he was something like an Ainu-Mongol of some kind and has bone structure unlike the tribes there today. How would a Caucasian (European) find his way over to the West Coast of the USA???  East Coast I can see but not the West Coast which is where Kennewick Man was found. The Indian tribes have been disgraceful in this affair

67 posted on 02/23/2006 8:51:34 AM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson