Skip to comments.
Wal-Mart bank ignites regulatory row [Utah]
Financial Times ^
| February 21 2006
| Jonathan Birchall
Posted on 02/21/2006 11:29:56 AM PST by ncountylee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: ncountylee
Have zero problem with this.
2
posted on
02/21/2006 11:30:29 AM PST
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: ncountylee
Who ever would have thought that socialism would come from the corporations?
3
posted on
02/21/2006 11:33:21 AM PST
by
Vladiator
To: ncountylee
I have a big problem with it.
4
posted on
02/21/2006 11:35:10 AM PST
by
bigsigh
To: Vladiator
Modern corpos like saving money more than sex.
5
posted on
02/21/2006 11:37:32 AM PST
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: ncountylee
I went to Wal-Mart bank and was only able to get this cheap Chinese money.
6
posted on
02/21/2006 11:42:49 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Next Olympics I want wide track bobsledding. Four sleds on the track at once - like Ben Hur on ice.)
To: norraad
Modern corpos like saving money more than sex.Since earning profits for their stock holders, not having sex, is the purpose of a corporation, I think that's understandable.
7
posted on
02/21/2006 11:44:51 AM PST
by
xroadie
To: xroadie
Yes, it's very true, my angle is some corpos go at it like hitler in a bunker.
It can reck havoc on the folks like me who are trying to run the machinery of the corp. w/o enough oil to keep things well lubed, because some necktie nazi wanted to impress his inferior superior by saving on necessary expenses.
8
posted on
02/21/2006 11:52:09 AM PST
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: ncountylee
Could you imagine the anger in the banking community when Wal Mart starts providing a host of banking and savings options at better rates than are currently being offered?
I think we would benefit from a Wal Mart bank.
To: norraad
but they sure hate to pay it out in interest to the actual owners..the stockholders
10
posted on
02/21/2006 11:59:55 AM PST
by
M-cubed
(Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
To: Vladiator
In the nineteenth century, Congress had been reluctant to regulate business. It often granted businesses absurd subsidies (for example, to encourage the railroads to expand across the U.S.), and regulated matters involving navigation, but for the most part, the governing theory was laissez-faire: leave the marketplace alone. In the twentieth century, Congress became increasingly interested in regulating business on a national scale--and there are several theories that attempt to explain why. One of the most intriguing is that presented in Gabriel Kolko's Triumph of Conservativism. Kolko, a socialist historian, unintentionally produced a spectacular defense of laissez-faire capitalism, demonstrating that most of the reason why Congress went into a frenzy of economic regulation in the Progressive Era (1900-16) was because the robber barons of the time were unable to figure out how to monopolize major industries--and so they needed the federal government's assistance.4 --
The above quote from Clayton Cramer's column in Shotgun News indicates it's not a new problem, either--(bold is mine)--
11
posted on
02/21/2006 12:02:32 PM PST
by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
To: pennboricua
Could you imagine the anger in the banking community when Wal Mart starts providing a host of banking and savings options at better rates than are currently being offered?Wal-Mart's initial thrust will be a credit card and finance operation, just like GMAC, GE Credit and a host of others. That's a long way from general banking operations.
12
posted on
02/21/2006 12:03:38 PM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
To: pennboricua
Could you imagine the anger in the banking community when Wal Mart starts providing a host of banking and savings options at better rates than are currently being offered?The comic value of watching banking execs standing next to neohippies, all whining about Wal*Mart squeezing the little guy, would be worth it alone.
13
posted on
02/21/2006 12:04:14 PM PST
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: bigsigh
I have a big problem with it. What is the problem you have with it?
14
posted on
02/21/2006 12:10:06 PM PST
by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
To: Antonello
The state is blocking commerce.
15
posted on
02/21/2006 12:11:19 PM PST
by
bigsigh
To: pennboricua
--I'd like to see them sell used cars--
16
posted on
02/21/2006 12:13:38 PM PST
by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
To: Vladiator
Who ever would have thought that socialism would come from the corporations? The competition will use whatever means necessary to deny Wal-Mart any ground. They'd probably be willing to shoot themselves in the head if it meant Wal-Mart couldn't have it.
17
posted on
02/21/2006 12:15:51 PM PST
by
TChris
("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
To: bigsigh
The state is blocking commerce. My apologies. I thought you were expressing that you had a problem with Wal*Mart's banking desires. Nevermind.
18
posted on
02/21/2006 12:16:28 PM PST
by
Antonello
(Oh my God, don't shoot the banana!)
To: rellimpank
The above quote from Clayton Cramer's column in Shotgun News indicates it's not a new problem, either--(bold is mine)--
The excerpt posted below from this link, The Destruction of a Wealth and Jobs Creator by Parasitical-Elites, is an excellent read.
The Destruction of a Wealth and Jobs Creator by Parasitical-Elites
James J. Hill was a 19th-century railroad entrepreneur. Hill was an integrated thinker who broke out of a restricted, one-country mode and began pushing into a worldwide mode. Unfortunately, just as Hill achieved great success in the American railroad industry and began spearheading an international expansion, his worldwide growth was snuffed out by glory-seeking politicians. The story of James J. Hill is documented in the book The Myth of the Robber Barons by Burton W. Folsom, Jr.
In that book, Folsom identifies how throughout history there have been two distinct types of entrepreneurs: political entrepreneurs and market entrepreneurs. Political entrepreneurs seek profits by working with the government to get subsidies, grants, and special privileges. In other words, political entrepreneurs seek success through political pull. In contrast, market entrepreneurs seek success by producing increasingly improved products and services at increasingly lower costs. The Destruction of a Wealth and Jobs Creator by Parasitical-Elites |
19
posted on
02/21/2006 12:16:38 PM PST
by
Zon
(Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
To: Antonello
My reading is that the story is about the state blocking WalMart while allow competitors to do business. The comment I was responding to said they had no problem with that.
20
posted on
02/21/2006 12:21:19 PM PST
by
bigsigh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson