Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Beat the High Cost of Gasoline. Forever!
money.cnn.com ^ | January 24, 2006 | Adam Lashinsky and Nelson D. Schwartz

Posted on 02/20/2006 8:32:49 PM PST by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: billbears
And that is the problem. Freemarkets are not going to jump on this in a big way. Where is the return on their R&D/manufacturing investments. My statements simply attempted to bring out the realities. I did not say I was for the federal government forces industry to buckle under and provide the solution. Perhaps my wording was misleading.
I simply stated some little problems with this thirty year old issue. If it was a simple as it may sound to some we all would be driving cars that use ethanol for fuel in the suggested ratio.
And as far as new oil drilling goes in the continental US, we face the same type problems. Even if all enviro nuts where caged, and the companies where given a free ride. How many would just jump in. It is enormously expensive to find and drill for new oil, as you probably are well aware.
We collectively have cut our throats dating back to the sixtees or so, when companies decided it was cheaper to just get the crude from the ME, South America, Africa, etc..
Why build and maintain new refineries when one can pay fixed cost to have say the Saudi refine the oil into gasoline, and the many mentioned fractions/cuts/end products that used to be done in the USA refineries and petrochemical plants.
Many on both sides of the political spectrum as well as the industries associated are all to blame for our now super dependence on foreign oil sources.
It is going to take a long time to become energy efficient and find new reliable sources of gas/oil/shale oil/coal synthetic substitutes etc..
Many programs have been given grants over the years such as working with the newer coal processes. We have enough coal in the US by some estimates to again become energy independent. But how many plants are taking this approach?
Answer. Very few. Money talks. Investors demand a return on their investments. Few are willing to plunge into these various technologies for a number of some time good reasons. As we saw with the so called promising shale oil processes. Pilot plants where invested in. As we see the oil companies did not get very far. It costs to damn much to get the end products whether it be gasoline, jet fuel, whatever from these process.
Where in a bit of a pickle. So the madman in Iran can practically get away with wholesale murder because we and the Europeans need their oil. Chavez can act like a super asshole and get away with it. Condi may talk tough, but the reality is we have no reason to invade and take over Venuzuala, Iran etc.. Nigerian Islamos can blow up all the oil wells and distributions centers, what are we going to do, send in the 1 or 2 Marine Divsions, Airborne and special forces as well as the navy and airforce and take over Nigeria to retain the badly needed oil we get from them.
I blam all our leaders since Eisehhower on up and the associated congresses for our current predicament.
At any rate, do have a great day, I gotta get some shut eye.
21 posted on 02/20/2006 9:27:58 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
I'm not sure what metric system you're using, but in the real metric system, one gallon equal 3785 mls (3.785 liters). That would equal 5 750 ml bottles not 12. Assuming your other figure (4 miles/750 ml) that yields 20 miles to the gallon.

Our gasoline consumption in 2004 was around 121 billion gallons a year. E85 fuel uses 85% ethanol so we'd need at least 103 billion gallons of ethanol per year. There's a story that was just posted from CNN hailing a breakthrough that will turn 1000 pounds of oat hay into 35-40 gallons of gasoline. Let's assume the higher number. In order to replace our current gasoline consumption, we'd need roughly 2.6 billion pounds of oat hay. There are about 30 pound of hay in a bushel, so we only need 866 million bushels of oat hay to meet our gasoline demands. Last year's total oat production was 119 million bushels of oat grain (I don't know what the amount of the leftover hay weighed, but I don't imagine it could be more than double the grain weight.) We averaged 56.8 bushels per acre. That means we'd need to plant an additional 15.2 million acres of oats to meet our current usage.

22 posted on 02/20/2006 9:28:10 PM PST by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
If corn fuels cars, plan on eating less meat.

Not true. The starch is taken out of the corn; leaving nearly the entire bulk of the corn to be used as feed.

My friend who grows corn for ethanol is the only guy around who can afford a new Corvette every year. Etc.

I highly doubt your friend is buying a new Corvette with income solely from a corn crop. He was probably smart enough to invest in the ethanol plant when it was built.

Here are some facts on the ethanol, among them this:

Q:Will we deplete human and animal food supplies by using corn and other grains for fuel production?

A: No, actually the production of ethanol from corn uses only the starch of the corn kernel. All of the valuable protein, minerals and nutrients remain. One bushel of corn produces about 2.7 gallons of ethanol AND 11.4 pounds of gluten feed (20% protein) AND 3 pounds of gluten meal (60% protein) AND 1.6 pounds of corn oil.

Source here, for more debunking of common myths with actual facts.

http://www.iowacorn.org/ethanol/ethanol_3b.html

23 posted on 02/20/2006 9:28:42 PM PST by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: billbears

I drive a hybrid. I get 60 mpg cruising down the highway. I am happy.


24 posted on 02/20/2006 9:35:08 PM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

105 octane and half the price of race gas.

I'm there! (if I could just find it!)


25 posted on 02/20/2006 9:35:54 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
The research seems to be in dispute.

It is expected, since E-85 is a cleaner burning fuel, that the life of a flexible fuel vehicle will be somewhat longer than a comparable gasoline vehicle. A gallon of E-85 ethanol fuel contains about 2/3 the energy of a gallon of gasoline. Based on ethanol's energy content (BTU), you might assume the mileage would be 2/3 less; but, fleet experience to date has found miles per gallon on ethanol have been around 10 percent higher than a direct BTU comparison. The E-85 Ford Taurus has been averaging around 20 miles per gallon and has experienced a 5 percent gain in horsepower. The price of E-85 ethanol fuel is about the same as the price of premium gasoline.

Link

26 posted on 02/20/2006 9:40:11 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: VeniVidiVici

There is a gas station in Virginia that sells it. Just one. It's going for more then super unleaded right now.


28 posted on 02/20/2006 9:43:23 PM PST by CJ Wolf (To Zot or Not That is the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MarcusTulliusCicero
"I'm not sure what metric system you're using,... "
Absolute alcohol is 200 proof, regular azeotrope ["grain alcohol"] - 190. Approximating no volume contraction on dilution w/ water, one dilutes 1 gal 200 proof alcohol into 2.5gal [9.46liters] of 80 proof solution = 12.616 of 750 ml bottles, and closer to 12 if one starts with 190 proof stuff. Verstehen?
You'll have to retake the arithmetics course: in original calculation "80 proof" was clearly specified.
29 posted on 02/20/2006 9:54:30 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Very easy way to beat high gas prices:

Get the vehicle you can be satisfied driving for a LONG time, take care of it, pay it off and keep it...spend the money you would have paid in monthly payments for a new car on gasoline....

Amazing how this simple logic is lost on SO many people....

30 posted on 02/20/2006 9:54:44 PM PST by ATCNavyRetiree (I can most times spot a liberal...they look weak, cowardly and undisciplined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
on an energy source that costs less than gasoline

That isn't what I've read elsewhere.

I swore off Conoco gas years ago when I read the fine print on the pump and found out they were cutting their gasoline with ethanol, which will damage the fuel systems on most cars.

31 posted on 02/20/2006 9:57:29 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
At what speed do you get 60 mpg??

Can you get the power necessary to pull a 30 foot travel trailer??

*It takes about 30% more ethanol than gasoline to drive a mile*

Instead of 21 mpg in my Ford v-6 i will get 14.7mpg. If I am figuring it right.

32 posted on 02/20/2006 10:02:42 PM PST by JoeBob (If you live like sheep the wolves will eat you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I was unimpressed by the last round of E85 cheer leading. Thinking then (and still) that's it's just an ADM tax-money grab. However, after reviewing the stunning success of Brazil's effort (they are not an oil importer anymore), I'm convinced that the idea has merit.

Gasoline will never go away. At least I hope not. I'll be one of the few drivers who would occasionally drive my old-school turbocharged gas car. But, I'd have no problem using an E85 car for everyday stuff. If we got to 60% alternative fuel consumption, Texas and Yankee oil could cover the rest.

The day we put Mid-East sheiks out of business for good will be the day I hoist a tall cold one in celebration.
33 posted on 02/20/2006 10:10:24 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step (US Military - Draining the Swamp of Terrorism since 2001!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
I was unimpressed by the last round of E85 cheer leading. Thinking then (and still) that's it's just an ADM tax-money grab. However, after reviewing the stunning success of Brazil's effort (they are not an oil importer anymore), I'm convinced that the idea has merit.

Brazil was busy "doing" while everyone else was talking. Ethanol had been largely an endeavor of farmers; co-ops; and some private investors. While they were screaming to the rooftops that the process had finally become economically viable; they were largely ignored.

Until about two years ago. Suddenly, investor groups started buying up the public offerings for new ethanol plants. They knew it; it just took a little time for the politicos to let you in on it.

If you want to get in on the next round, buy into biodiesel plants; many are in the planning stages. You may have about 1/2 day to make a decision if what is going on around here is any indication. Usually a minimum 10-20K investment.

34 posted on 02/20/2006 10:23:25 PM PST by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

I stand corrected. So, you'll only have to approximately double the production of oats to meet the demand. Might be difficult to do since production has fallen 90% since 1920.


35 posted on 02/20/2006 10:33:29 PM PST by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rate_Determining_Step
Turbocharging and E85 LINKS:

Saab 9-5 Aero BioPower - The Timing's Just Too Good

"Saab showed the 9-5 Aero BioPower concept today in LA. It's an ethanol-compatible vehicle, but differs from run-of-the-mill "flex-fuel" cars in that it actually provides better performance when running on ethanol. E85's 104 octane rating allowed engineers to advance the 2.3L engine's ignition timing and increase the turbo boost 20%. The result is 310 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque compared to 260 hp and 258 lb ft on premium unleaded."

Liquor Does It Quicker (Saab’s BioPower engine gives ethanol a kick in the pants)

"With all the buzz about hybrids, it’s easy to ignore our homegrown alternative fuel: ethanol. Clean-burning and infinitely renewable—we’re talking grain alcohol—ethanol is dear to environmentalists and economists alike. The standard 85/15-percent ethanol/gasoline blend (E85) is widely used in Sweden, but there are only 313 E85 fueling stations in the U.S. And motorheads aren’t clamoring for more, because E85 typically delivers inferior fuel economy; it has about 75 percent of the potential energy of gasoline, so it takes up to 20 percent more hooch to keep horsepower on par. But E85 also has a high octane rating (around 110), and Saab realized that a turbocharger could harness it. Turbos push extra air into the cylinder, and higher octane allows a fuel to better endure the increased pressure. So Saab cranked up its fans and created the BioPower engine, the first commercially available ethanol turbo. A computer samples the fuel mixture and adjusts boost pressure—from 5.8 psi for pure gasoline to 13.8 psi for E85. Running straight gasoline, the engine produces 148 horsepower, but E85 jacks it up to 184, with no penalty in fuel economy."

36 posted on 02/20/2006 10:36:26 PM PST by Conservative Firster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

Isn't that funny? I can find race gas all over the place but no E85.


37 posted on 02/20/2006 10:38:52 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
How many people are willing to purchase a hybrid car?

I'm waiting for a hybrid mini-van! Having a plug in option would be awesome, as well.

38 posted on 02/20/2006 10:42:09 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

"Proof", when referring to alcohol, means the point at which it will sustain combustion (burn, or PROVE it's booze). This is about 57.5%, or 42.5% water. 100 proof is 42.5% water.

80 proof alcohol is about 54% water.

You'll get a nasty headache if you drink too much of it, but you sure ain't driving home if you put it in your tank.


39 posted on 02/20/2006 10:55:41 PM PST by Don W (Stoneage man survived thousands of years of bitter-cold ice. Modern man WILLsurvive global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
....."damage the fuel systems on most cars.".....

Let me be direct. That's a lie if your car is less than 15 years old. It requires you change the float in the carb (if its plasitc or foam)if you have one and the fuel line if it's rubber. Period. If you have fuel injectors, no problemo! Got to Walley world and look at the labels on the fuel additives. Several will list METHANOL as an ingredient. It is far worse than ethanol and would make you sick just smelling it.

40 posted on 02/20/2006 10:57:41 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson