Skip to comments.
Jesus and Mohammed Smooching: Gay 'Tolerance' Cartoon Published by University of Toronto
LifeSite ^
| Februrary 20, 2006
| John-Henry Westen
Posted on 02/20/2006 4:26:03 PM PST by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: NYer
If it's the same picture I'm thinking about, it didn't show muhameds face, only his back. It did show the face of Jesus, so they're safe, and they know it.
41
posted on
02/20/2006 6:05:34 PM PST
by
processing please hold
(Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
To: lunarbicep
Chickenshit homos! LOL!
"Let's be brave and controversial, but don't show Mohammeds face. My head is FABULOUS and I'd like to keep it!"
42
posted on
02/20/2006 6:14:30 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: NYer
The University of Toronto is as left-wing as it gets...
To: NYer
44
posted on
02/20/2006 6:51:07 PM PST
by
Dallas59
((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
To: pbrown; dead; NYer; Northern Yankee; Victoria Delsoul
If it's the same picture I'm thinking about, it didn't show muhameds face, only his back. It did show the face of Jesus, so they're safe, and they know it. Completely gutless and cowardly. In true form, courtesy of the University of Toronto's finest.
45
posted on
02/20/2006 6:53:35 PM PST
by
kstewskis
(Buy Danish!)
To: Northern Yankee; kstewskis; NYer; lunarbicep
Gee... who will it be... fanatical Muslims or Christians? Nah, did you notice the cartoonist made sure not to depict Mohammed's face as is the Islamic tradition, and the one who is doing the gay kissing is Jesus? So it's more attuned to ridiculing Christians than Muslims. Such a liberal university has no qualms violating the limits of free speech when it comes to making a mockery of Christianity.
Thanks for posting the graphic, lunarbicep.
To: NYer
Someone post that horrible photo of the imam french kissing the young boy.
47
posted on
02/20/2006 6:59:02 PM PST
by
ViLaLuz
(Stop the ACLU - Support the Public Expression of Religion Act 2005 - Call your congressmen.)
To: Victoria Delsoul; kstewskis
These people are like sophmores in high school.
They haven't grown up.
To: Northern Yankee
They're mental midgets, lol.
To: lunarbicep
I guess it's 'ok', tolerant, to show Jesus kissing another man. But the cowardly cartoonist concealed Mohammed's face. If it is indeed Mohammed, who could be sure? He's left himself an out. Ok to offend Muslims and Christians, but if the Muslims complain too loudly, just back away from the identity of the man in Arab dress.
To: kstewskis
Completely gutless and cowardly.I agree.
51
posted on
02/20/2006 7:53:18 PM PST
by
processing please hold
(Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
To: Victoria Delsoul; Northern Yankee; kstewskis; lunarbicep
52
posted on
02/21/2006 1:29:12 AM PST
by
NYer
(Discover the beauty of the Eastern Catholic Churches - freepmail me for more information.)
To: NYer; Victoria Delsoul; kstewskis
I saw the tatoo of the crescent moon, and star.
Certainly showing the Islam sign. I just think the whole thing is absurd.
It still drives me nuts with the use of the word tolerance. In the words of Archbishop Sheen, nothing good comes from the word tolerance. It only perpetuates an evil:
Toleratio est permissio negativa mali.
Translated to being: Tolerance is a negative permission of evil.
To: NYer
SO, what actually was the intended discussion that was supposed to occur? (Other than the one debating whether these students really belong in college.)
There's no substantive discussion to be had...Just a display of religious intolerance by the newspapers themselves. "We're printing this, because we can"
No kidding, and people resent you for it, "because we can"
To: NYer
The student newspaper (
The Strand) that printed the cartoon has a poll up on it.
Currently, (as of 2/21/2006 at the time of this post), 50% were offended by the cartoon and another 18% were opposed to the idea of printing the cartoon (not offended but opposed to the idea of printing the cartoon).
Only 28% viewed a favorable opinion of printing the cartoon and that was broken down into a 12% category and an 18% category.
Another 4% did not understand the cartoon. I will try to post a link to the article to this Freeper thread, so other people can view the poll.
55
posted on
02/21/2006 9:35:33 AM PST
by
topher
(Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
To: NYer
We're coming over there and we're gonna draw cartoons about ya'!
Take that.
To: NYer
57
posted on
02/21/2006 10:56:18 AM PST
by
topher
(Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
To: Northern Yankee; NYer; Victoria Delsoul
Toleratio est permissio negativa mali. 
58
posted on
02/21/2006 3:04:51 PM PST
by
kstewskis
(Buy Danish!)
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
59
posted on
02/21/2006 3:45:30 PM PST
by
Coleus
(IMHO, The IVF procedure is immoral & kills many embryos/children and should be outlawed)
To: Victoria Delsoul
Nailed it ! Thought the same thing Myself.
60
posted on
02/21/2006 3:48:31 PM PST
by
ABN 505
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson