Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reagandemo
I think that the ACLU claim, as best I understand it is nebulous. I would think that a certain minimal amount of reference to a divine being has to be permitted..... after all our money says "In God we trust".

Does THAT imply the endorsement of a divine being that is prohibited by the constitution? I'm sure that the ACLU's case is more complex than that but I think it shows that there was no intent to ban any mention of a God.

This comes down to the ACLU's punishment of an organization which doesn't like queers around young boys.

33 posted on 02/20/2006 12:30:37 PM PST by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: lOKKI
Or, alternatively, that Boy Scouts of America has been so successful in keeping the pedophiles away from the boys that the perverts at the ACLU can only get near them in court.

Something to think about.

I have no doubt ACLU members have impure thoughts about children.

44 posted on 02/20/2006 2:04:40 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson