On occasion, Rush is wrong. Not often, but sometimes. Often it's because he backs President Bush when the evidence suggests that maybe Bush is wrong on a particular issue.
I don't see any evidence presented here that Schumer is wrong. Nor can I see how the company that supervises and runs the ports and dictates the hiring can be said not to have anything to do with security.
Even if the board of the company are opposed to al Qaeda, this is still an unacceptably risky idea. It would be much too easy for terrorists to work their way in, or for sympathetic Muslim workers to get word out to their friends about the port layouts and security procedures.
Is Rush saying that the port bosses won't be told anything about security arrangements? I fail to see how that could be possible. It would be a very strange way of doing things.
He hasn't touched on the UAE port story yet.
"Is Rush saying that the port bosses won't be told anything about security arrangements?"
Actually he hasn't said anything about this yet. He's still on Cheney and the Cheney coverage. It may this is going to be considered a "local" story, because the other ABC guys talked about it today.