Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KrisKrinkle
I probably believe that to the same degree you appear to believe it, but in regard to different things.

I believe that force may never be initiated against anyone for any reason, with no exceptions. Is that what you believe?

And someplace in this mess you said that you told your boss you’d throw him out of your house if he spoke in therein in a manner of which you disapproved.

Sigh--it's endless. Now I have to try and get through to you what "initiation of force" means. Hint: self-defense is not an initiation of force.

How will you get him out without inititating force?

A trespasser has initiated the use of force by trespassing. Pumping him full of lead is defense of one's self and/or property.

476 posted on 02/26/2006 4:35:26 PM PST by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]


To: Shalom Israel

"..self-defense is not an initiation of force"

Reminds me of the old ploy: "I hit him back first."

"A trespasser has initiated the use of force by trespassing. "

I deny signing by any means any kind of contract or agreement with those blanket terms, therefore I am not obligated to accept those blanket terms.

By what I understand to be your standards, I don't see how you can disagree with that unless you try to prove I did sign up which I'm sure you'll try.




480 posted on 02/26/2006 9:42:05 PM PST by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson