My choices are: accept the "contract" I never agreed to; leave the country; or become an "outlaw". Leaving the country implies the loss of my property rights. Becoming an "outlaw" implies the continual risk that I'll be caught and puished for breaching a "contract" I never signed in the first place.
So the terms are "sign it, flee or live in fear". That's a textbook example of duress.
My choices are: accept the "contract" I never agreed to;
Your parents agreed to live under our Constitutional contract, and you were obligated as a child to honor your parents wishes till your own maturity. -- Correct izzy?
[My choice is] leave the country; or become an "outlaw".
No, you have the option to stay in the USA, and honor our Constitutions rule of law. In return, your own rights would be honored by your peers. Correct?
-- Instead, you want to argue that this option violates some 'right'. -- Which right izzy?
Leaving the country implies the loss of my property rights.
Not at all. Many expatriates own property in the US.
Becoming an "outlaw" implies the continual risk that I'll be caught and puished for breaching a "contract" I never signed in the first place.
Outlaws are caught and punished for their criminal acts izzy. Whereas millions of people in the USA ignore our Constitutional contract, -- every day, - and go unpunished. [except for the scorn of their peers]
So the terms are "sign it, flee or live in fear". That's a textbook example of duress.
Are you living now in duress & fear izzy? Why?
-- Or are you simply complaining about some aspects of our Constitutions contract that don't suit you? -- Which ones?
Why not work with the rest of us to effect political change?
Again: Have you got a reason I should say another word we'd disagree over?
And to: "So the terms are "sign it, flee or live in fear". That's a textbook example of duress."
Which text book?