Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
Would you consider the prevention of the deaths of approximately 10-15% of the population to be a legitimate function of a central government?

It would depend on the circumstances. If the demographics are right, having 10-15% of a population die of old age in a 10-15 year period wouldn't be unusual. What do you think government would do about this, and why don't you answer the original question?

373 posted on 02/24/2006 5:16:22 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

"It would depend on the circumstances. If the demographics are right, having 10-15% of a population die of old age in a 10-15 year period wouldn't be unusual. What do you think government would do about this, and why don't you answer the original question?"

These people didn't die of old age. They did from famine and disease following the collapse of the central government. So, do you think the prevention of the deaths of a million people from disease and famine is a legitimate function of government?

The original question? By that I presume you mean do I think any central government could have prevented this? Well, it happened after the central government collapsed, not before.


390 posted on 02/24/2006 10:43:11 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Stupidity can be a self-correcting problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson