Why should I argue against our property rights? My car trunk is my property, and I have the power to use it to store a weapon while I'm working. -- My employer has no power to infringe on that right by using irrational reasoning about his own rights being 'violated'.. My trunk is not his property, and nothing in it can 'violate' his property.
Your trunk is your property. You can put anything in it you please.
Thank you for that 'concession' izzy.
Your employer's parking lot is his property, and he gets to say whether your car is allowed there.
Again, -- you deny the reality of local parking laws. -- Fruitless repetition.
He said it is, as long as there are no guns in it. If you can't get that through your head,
You're fruitlessly repeating yourself.
then further discussion is fruitless.
Curiously, I notice you have conspicuously avoided claiming you can bring your gun into the building, even though a weapon carried on your person is your constitutional right. Why not? Simple: you do realize that your employer can ban personal firearms in the work place. If you pondered that, you would realize that he can ban anything he wants on his property, including his parking lot.
A political compromise has been made with irrational anti-gun nuts, izzy. They can keep guns out of their buildings, but they can't ban them altogether.
Forcing him to do otherwise is a violation of his rights.
There you go again, -- a gun in a car trunk violates no ones 'right'.
His rule isn't a violation of your rights, because you have no right to enter his property at all. It's a privilege granted, or not, by the property owner.
You're fruitlessly repeating old points.
Because you have never answered them. I keep repeating them, in hopes that you'll either (1) realize they're correct, or (2) actually attempt to prove them wrong.