To: Just mythoughts
While I am no fan of the buyer of this 'port' business, seems that port security is already run by foreigners. I do not recall Congress whelping about security before now. You see no difference between a British-owned company running the ports and one owned by Arabs in UAE/Dubai?
I wonder why no US-based firm stepped up? We know a little about logistics.
Port of Los Angeles
60 posted on
02/19/2006 9:27:17 AM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
"You see no difference between a British-owned company running the ports and one owned by Arabs in UAE/Dubai? "
Terrorists live and blow things up in Britain, so NO I do not 'trust' foreign corporations as first line defenders of our ports, from any foreign nation.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson