Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garyhope
What, they asked a pimply faced 17 year old "associate" behind the counter "Do your fries have any gluten in them?", "No, they're just potatoes"

Doesn't matter if they asked the 17 y/o behind the counter or the CEO. In our Anglo-American common law system, a company is responsible for the actions of its employees if those actions are done while on the job and as part of the job. The doctrine, respondeat superior, goes back to the age-old question: who's in the best position to avoid the harm...the people who cook a million fries a day or the person who visits McD's a few times a year?
9 posted on 02/19/2006 3:52:59 AM PST by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: hispanichoosier

You said, in part: Doesn't matter if they asked the 17 y/o behind the counter or the CEO. In our Anglo-American common law system, a company is responsible for the actions of its employees if those actions are done while on the job and as part of the job.
***
You are correct, of course. The issue here is whether it is part of the job description of the counter help to advise what the ingredients in the cooking oil used by McDonald's are. I am not sure that it is part of that job.


19 posted on 02/19/2006 4:05:42 AM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: hispanichoosier

You have a point.

They will lose. Due diligence on the part of the parents is not satisified by simply asking a sever to validate the absense of a threat to their minor child's welfare, and the parents already knew this, as well, unless they are retarded.
This is another ham & egger looking for a quick pay out from deep pockets

I could break this down in one minute.
So will Micky D.


21 posted on 02/19/2006 4:07:49 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: hispanichoosier
The doctrine, respondeat superior, goes back to the age-old question: who's in the best position to avoid the harm...the people who cook a million fries a day or the person who visits McD's a few times a year?

I would think the people in the best position to avoid harm are the parents of the child, who can certainly prepare food safe for their child without having to rely on the chemistry expertise of a fast-food monkey.

I hope the judgment they receive will assuage the pain of their loss.

62 posted on 02/19/2006 7:08:12 AM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: hispanichoosier

Spoken like someone with a lawsuit.

If you ask the janitor in a hospital for medical advice, and it proves wrong - can you sue the hospital?

Any idiot who thinks the server at a McD's knows anything other than how to 'supersize' deserves any reactions they get.


69 posted on 02/19/2006 7:37:10 AM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson