[DJ MacWoW]

Well anyway, the points have been made on this thread, the UAE is not taking over the US ports, and that some on FR are very suceptible to hillary/schumer/michael savage hyperbole.

I never addressed that issue in my post. I addressed your feeble statement " Then where was your, hillary's, schumer's, and savage's outrage when a British(foreign) company was operting port terminals.". If you cannot offer proof that Brits are a danger to us the same as Arabs then you might want to use a better analogy.

[Dane]

I never addressed that issue in my post. I addressed your feeble statement " Then where was your, hillary's, schumer's, and savage's outrage when a British(foreign) company was operting port terminals.". If you cannot offer proof that Brits are a danger to us the same as Arabs then you might want to use a better analogy.

Uh dj maccy wowwow, the point has already been made, the P&O shareholders approved the selling of control of their company to DPWorld, don't get mad at me, you should be directing your animus at the shareholders.

Oh that's right, that would actually make you look at facts, rather than spinning records(according to your moniker) nevermind.

[DJ MacWoW]

Well anyway, the points have been made on this thread, the UAE is not taking over the US ports, and that some on FR are very suceptible to hillary/schumer/michael savage hyperbole.

There may have been "points made" but I see nothing that settles this issue. And this should give everyone pause:

The committee earlier agreed to consider concerns about the deal as expressed by a Miami-based company, Eller & Co., according to Eller's lawyer, Michael Kreitzer. Eller is a business partner with the British shipping giant but was not in the running to buy the ports company.

Dubai firm set to take charge of 6 U.S. ports

Why would Eller be concerned? They work with the British company. Are you going to try to tell me that THEY don't know what goes on in a port?