[SkyPilot]

No. They pulled the ATM photo records (you are photographed every time you use the ATM) and had photos of him using the ATM at that time and date.

It was a no brainer after that evidence came forward.

[Bommer]

Sorry. There is nothing in the article about "Photographic Proof"

A jury found Ramirez not guilty after he produced ATM receipts and cell phone records showing he was miles from the scene when the crime occurred.

The ruling ALONE shows there there was no photographic proof

A judge later made the rare finding that he was "factually innocent."

How is someone "Factually Innocent" with photographical proof?