Right. So what facts that I have presented do you take issue with, and what facts are you presenting in rebuttal? Maybe your unsourced comment that "I've learned on another thread that the company will not be operating the ports?" Or maybe your rather strange reassurance that "the Feds are still overseeing security."
I confess, I'm rather outraged by this policy decision. But I'm also rather perplexed by the apologetics being offered in defense of it.
Since you and Dane seem to be of the view that this particular $6.8 billion buy out of P&O involves a couple of rowboats