Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: atlaw
DP World said it had received all regulatory approvals. "We intend to maintain and, where appropriate, enhance current security arrangements," the company said.

Well, someone on this thread said that Tony Snow reported that the Feds are still overseeing security. Your quote above may imply that the company is talking about compliance. Like I said earlier, I'll have to learn more before I jump to any conclusions. I don't rely on what Chuck Schumer says, that's for sure.

The Republican reps are right when they ask for more investigation. It doesn't hurt to know more of the facts.

217 posted on 02/17/2006 7:28:12 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: Siena Dreaming
Well, someone on this thread said that Tony Snow reported that the Feds are still overseeing security.

Oh honestly. This is the most patently ridiculous excuse imaginable. A state-owned company of the United Arab Emirates will be operating the ports, but not to worry, because the Feds, in addition to policing the cargo, will also be policing the dockworkers, the company responsible for handling the cargo, and the company responsible for hiring the dockworkers. Please.

Operations cannot be segregated from security, and to imagine that the two can be miraculously segregated is to lapse whole hog into fantasy.

220 posted on 02/17/2006 7:40:52 AM PST by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson