To: billorites
Two comments by the plaintiff stand out as "hugh!" particularly as quoted verbatim ...
(1) said she has no desire to again be characterized "as a fat, black, foul-mouthed ghetto momma"
No one but her used those words.
(2) she said there was no one on the jury "to advocate for race. ... but it was not a jury of my peers. There wasn't even an ethnic minority there to advocate for me."
Jurisprudence is NOT about advocacy on the jury M'am. Your LAWYER is your advocate before the Bench and the jury. The jury is INSTRUCTED to be advocates for the law, justice and society -- to decide the case on the law based on the evidence and arguments presented. Period.
This woman is an "executive". May God have mercy on her co-workers when she tries to engage in meaningful decision-making.
9 posted on
02/16/2006 4:52:36 AM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: Blueflag
What makes you think she works?
13 posted on
02/16/2006 4:57:03 AM PST by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: Blueflag
How would you like to have to work with that women. Jeesh!
To: Blueflag
"(2) she said there was no one on the jury "to advocate for race. ... but it was not a jury of my peers. There wasn't even an ethnic minority there to advocate for me."
"
So it is the duty of a minority juror to avoid the weight of the evidence against this woman and lobby for handouts?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson