But what about progress? What if a private developer wants to build a 300 story hotel complete with an indoor putt putt course? /barf-o-matic off
Good for them - its nice to see them get it right.
Good
"...was one of more than 200 measures dealt with by the House in barely more than an hour Tuesday. "
I don't see how that can be good news.
A little help here please. If the USSC already ruled that it is constitutional for a government to take property via eminent domain for private commercial development, what good would a state government passing a law banning the procedure do? Wouldn't it be like abortions, where if a local government made it illegal to do abortions, the court would just say "You can't do that"? (Possibly not the best illustration, but you get the point)