Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2006 10:42:48 AM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: SirLinksalot
Now that the U.S. trade deficit for 2005 has come in at $726 billion, the fourth straight all-time record, a question arises. Yeah, like, who cares?
2 posted on 02/15/2006 10:47:13 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

He's not dead?

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F


3 posted on 02/15/2006 10:47:58 AM PST by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Isn't there a rule somewhere that says anything from Pat has to have a BARF ALert?

If there's not, there sure should be.


4 posted on 02/15/2006 10:48:14 AM PST by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Too bad they're not outsourcing whack job columnists.
5 posted on 02/15/2006 10:51:12 AM PST by jpf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

More echoings from within Pat Buchanan's Hollow Head.


6 posted on 02/15/2006 10:51:16 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Unfortunately, conservative columnist Paul Craig Roberts..

PCR is a leftwing moonbat. And if Pat thinks otherwise, he is one too.

7 posted on 02/15/2006 10:52:39 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones; Pyro7480; ...
Now that the U.S. trade deficit for 2005 has come in at $726 billion, the fourth straight all-time record, a question arises.

What constitutes failure for a free-trade policy? Or is there no such thing? Is free trade simply right no matter the results?

Bump!

8 posted on 02/15/2006 10:53:05 AM PST by A. Pole (If outsourcing is such a good thing, why don't the executives outsource their own jobs overseas?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Maybe so, but from the point of view of commerce there wouldn't be trade if there were no profits being made. There must be more to the story.


10 posted on 02/15/2006 10:55:01 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

I used to like to watch Pat make fun of eleanor clift, but that was years ago. Now he's just a bitter, loser nut.


11 posted on 02/15/2006 10:55:34 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Pat Buchanan--the male Arianna Huffington.


12 posted on 02/15/2006 10:55:53 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (An agnostic for religious freedom, not Islamofascistic multiculti PC secularism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Last year, the United States ran a $202 billion trade deficit with China, the largest ever between two nations.

They get the money, but we get all the stuff.

If we thought the paper drink umbrellas and the cheap rain coats and the plastic shoes weren't worth the couple bucks we paid for them, we wouldn't make the deal.

If we want crappy Chinese products, it's none of the Federal Government's (or Pat Buchanan's) business.

13 posted on 02/15/2006 10:57:05 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
"The affluent free-traders, whose wealth resides in stocks in global companies, are enriching themselves at the expense of their fellow citizens and sacrificing the American worker on the altar of the Global Economy.

None dare call it economic treason."

I agree with Pat. I think more people are hurt by our trade polices than helped.

Problem is: the working people hurt by these policies are the same ones who hate Conservatives like Pat. I noticed the AFL-CIO doesn't give a damn about the workers hurt by free trade and massive legal immigrantion and the invasion of this country by illegal aliens.

But I don't see anything changing. I'll continue to invest my money on the assumption the trade/budget deficits will continue to increase. Commodity prices will go up, and the value of the dollar will decrease.
14 posted on 02/15/2006 10:58:55 AM PST by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Ok, what's wrong with my browser. All I get is:
blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah
blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah
blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah
blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah
blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah
blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah
blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah
blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah

From now on please use babelfish to convert Pat's writings from
'Stupid' to 'English'.

20 posted on 02/15/2006 11:03:25 AM PST by ParityErr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Pat riles them up because he puts the good of American citizens before all others.

Unable to refute Pat's truth, smearers are reduced to name-callers.

29 posted on 02/15/2006 11:10:38 AM PST by ex-snook (God of the Universe, God of Creation, God of Love, thank you for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Pat Buchanan says:
Again, when can we say a free-trade policy has failed?

Logician2u says, why do people like Buchanan continue to think NAFTA is free trade?

38 posted on 02/15/2006 11:19:23 AM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
When NAFTA was up for a vote in 1993, the Clintonites and their GOP fellow-travelers said it would grow our trade surplus

What trade surplus? Has the US even had a trade surplus since the 1960's?

This has nothing to do with NAFTA and everything to do with GATT and the Roosevelt era policy reducing tarriffs.

48 posted on 02/15/2006 11:25:49 AM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Pat wants to give US tax dollars to Hamas, but he doesn't want us to employ Mexicans or buy things from Asians. Weird man.
49 posted on 02/15/2006 11:27:08 AM PST by elhombrelibre (MSM: de facto allies of America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

save


51 posted on 02/15/2006 11:28:48 AM PST by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Maybe the Democrats should hire Buchanan. He sounds alot like Clinton did in 1992 when he blathered on about how this country was suffering through the worse economy in 50 years.


52 posted on 02/15/2006 11:29:13 AM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

Pat is an idiot. when software is shipped out the country it is billed - often for tax purposes - at the cost of the media not the product. So a $100 export might be for 5 million. We export a chip plant to Isreal, does every bit of the intellectual captial get added to the install - NO!!


56 posted on 02/15/2006 11:34:33 AM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson