Replies

"I wonder which religion's he focused on? What his test was?

For instance: Is a person of power who claims to speak with a higher power that leads us into a war for oil likely involved in an evil religion? (kimball answers his own rhetoric... YES, that mans religion is no doubt evil)

Does a religion seek to deny rights to deserving segments of society like homosexuals? (kimball again: absolutely, Christianity is an antiquated evil religion that seeks to destroy the world in the name of "Jesus". )

Are religions whose practitioners are forced to fight oppression by whatever means necessary evil? (kimball says: No, they are simply surviving, if Israel would stop their oppression of the Palestinians and the US would halt its imperialism on the world then no Muslim would have to attack the US or Israel)

This is all speculation but my guess, after reading a bit about these schools, is that his speech wasn't ideologically far off of my guess.

I can only hope I am dead wrong."

You are about as wrong as you could possibly be. Maybe you should take a little time to learn something about someone's ideas instead of applying your unfounded, ignorant generalities to them. “Angel of Vision: Christians and the Middle East” That was the title of another book by Kimball. He sure sounds like a rampaging anti-Christian. Most of the stuff I've read about him has to do with his criticism of Islam.

Thanks for the advice. I didn't have time to go searching out his politics. I didn't APPLY my unfounded, ignorant generalities. I never claimed thats what he said, I simply wondered.

I wonder which religion's he focused on? What his test was?

Pay special note to the last 2 sentences. I clearly state that this is speculation, and I hoped I was wrong, ...

This is all speculation but my guess, after reading a bit about these schools, is that his speech wasn't ideologically far off of my guess.

I can only hope I am dead wrong

Thanks a lot for implying that I was propagating a lie about this man, which I was not. I simply speculated as to his content based on what I've read about the schools curriculum.

So, maybe you should follow your own advice and take a little time to learn something about someone's ideas by reading the content of my post. I never applied those words to Kimball, I stated that I wondered what he did in my first sentence, and noted that it was all speculation in the 2nd to last sentence. So calm down with your unfounded, ignorant generalities about me and what I was saying.

I repeat, hopefully I was dead wrong and it seems I am - that is a good thing. So your indignation is misplaced. I'd say an apology is in order.