Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thoeting
But for single mothers supporting a family, options are limited. Remember the Welfare-To-Work program? For women to get off of welfare and work a job, someone has to watch the kids. These women are caught in a Catch-22.

Correction: these women have, for the most part, chosen to put themselves in a Catch-22

57 posted on 02/12/2006 10:13:26 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: SauronOfMordor
Yes, you are correct. Many times they make a conscious decision to have a child out of wedlock. Obviously, this is not true in every case, but it is true in enough cases that it becomes the stereotype.

But the mothers are required to come off welfare. The kids have to go somewhere so the moms can work.

Again, a catch-22 in which the child pays the price of the mother's foolishness.

This is one of the reasons I encourage my girls to date guys from intact families so that there is the expectation from both sides that marriage is a bond that we don't walk away from when things get hard. Note I said encourage, not require. Teens can be squirrely enough to go against mom and dad just for the thrill of the unknown.

66 posted on 02/12/2006 10:26:35 AM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson